Skip to content
Sports only · every sport · live context
LiveSportInsights

Van den Berg and Willemse change the Springboks' decisions around a settled pack

South Africa has retained its starting forwards for Baltimore. The new halfback and fullback choices should connect that platform, not force a different identity.

LI LiveSportInsights Editorial Desk08 Sep 2026 · 2 min read
Van den Berg and Willemse change the Springboks' decisions around a settled pack
Illustrative sports photographyRugby desk

South Africa has named an unchanged starting pack for the Baltimore Test, with Morné van den Berg coming in at scrumhalf and Damian Willemse returning at fullback. The Springboks lead the series 2–1. Our reading is that the selections preserve the central platform while changing how the side can use possession on either side of it.

Van den Berg's first decision is about usable speed

Quick service is valuable only if the next receiver has a coherent picture. A scrumhalf can move the ball rapidly into a crowded area and still make the attack easier to defend. We would want van den Berg to distinguish between a genuine opportunity to accelerate and a phase that needs another secure carry.

With Sacha Feinberg-Mngomezulu outside him, the connection should make the defence respect more than one outcome. A pass, a short carry and a kick do not all need to be used equally. They need to remain credible enough that the All Blacks cannot commit early to the preferred option.

Willemse needs a connected backfield

The official report says Willemse replaces Cheslin Kolbe, who is unavailable after the third Test. The tactical question is not whether the replacement can reproduce every action of the absent player. It is whether the back three agree on who covers the kick, who offers support and when the counterattack is worth attempting.

Our preference would be to secure the first receipt before chasing a dramatic return. A clean exit can preserve the forwards' field position; a forced counterattack from an isolated catch can undo several phases of work. The opportunity to run should be recognised, not assumed.

Keep the selection changes proportionate

An unchanged pack suggests continuity in the physical platform, but it does not guarantee the same quality of possession. The All Blacks can alter their pressure and the game state may demand a different response from the previous Test.

We would judge the two changes by how well they connect the existing strengths. If van den Berg's service and Willemse's backfield decisions keep South Africa playing in useful areas, the selection has done its job. The Springboks do not need each new starter to produce the match-winning moment. They need fewer moments in which the team becomes disconnected around them.

Cover photograph: Unsplash, illustrative sports imagery; not a photograph of the reported event.

Questions from the stands

What do van den Berg and Willemse change for South Africa in Baltimore?

Our analysis focuses on the connection around the retained pack: van den Berg's choice between speed and control, and Willemse's coordination of the backfield. We would assess whether they preserve useful possession, not whether they imitate the players they replace.

Sources & further reading

Reporting supports the facts; the interpretation is our editorial view. Published 08 Sep 2026. Updated 08 Sep 2026, 04:40 CAT.

The wider conversation

September rugby: Test matches and club form

Sale’s support lines made their opening win convincing; stronger opposition will test whether those connections survive less space. At Test level, our Springboks–All Blacks preview focuses on exits, territory and the pressure created by the next kick.

More reporting, viewpoints and match contextExplore the topic →

The discussion room

Comments · 0

Open discussion · comments publish immediately

Add your view

What did you see in the game?

Bring an observation, a number or a respectful disagreement. You can contribute as a guest or a signed-in member.

✓ Guest names are optional

✓ Email addresses are never public

✓ Member history stays in your profile

Return to this discussion to read replies.

Guest comments are public immediately. Names are optional; email addresses are never shown.

Be the first to add useful context.

Keep reading

More rugby insight