Skip to content
Sports only · every sport · live context
LiveSportInsights

Sharks 26–16 Cowboys: Hynes made the kick threat work for his run

Cronulla advanced through their elimination final. Hynes’s late try shows the value of keeping a running option after the defence has begun to expect a kick.

LI LiveSportInsights Editorial Desk12 Sep 2026 · 3 min read

Nicho Hynes’s late try in Cronulla’s 26–16 elimination-final win over North Queensland began with a decision he encouraged somebody else to make. On the last tackle, the Cowboys had to prepare for a kick. Hynes kept the ball and ran. For us, that choice explains more about the Sharks’ attack than simply celebrating a decisive individual finish.

The official club report confirms the result at Allianz Stadium and Cronulla’s passage to week two. Sione Katoa scored twice, with Siosifa Talakai, Will Kennedy and Hynes also crossing. The Sharks will face the loser of Sunday’s Panthers–Roosters qualifying final. Source: Sharks match report.

The defence was already answering a different question

ABC’s live account of Hynes’s try describes him shaping to kick towards the corner before stepping past Jason Taumalolo. It also records Scott Drinkwater moving towards that corner in anticipation, leaving space behind the front-line defender. Hynes’s conversion made it 26–12. Source: ABC Sport, 66th-minute entry.

Our reading is that the run gained value because the kick was credible. A defender who must protect the landing area cannot simultaneously occupy every route through the middle. The attacking opportunity emerges when the ball-carrier recognises that movement while he still has the balance and space to change his action.

That is a more demanding instruction than telling a half-back to improvise. Teammates need to provide credible options around him, and the attack must leave him enough time to see which defender commits. Repeating the same finish against a defence that stays compact would be a different decision, even if the field position looked identical.

The earlier kicking still mattered

Cronulla’s report highlights Braydon Trindall’s kicking and the work of the chase. AAP’s match report carried by ABC likewise identifies pressure on the Cowboys’ receivers. Those details give context to an attack in which the next kick had to be taken seriously.

The chase matters beyond a possible handling error. Our view is that a well-organised line also has to be ready for a clean catch: close the receiver’s first route, complete the tackle and make the next possession begin under pressure. An attacking plan built only around an opponent dropping the ball would be fragile.

A lead still had to be defended

Jaxon Purdue’s late try reduced the gap to ten points. Both the club report and ABC’s live account record Ronaldo Mulitalo making an important late tackle as North Queensland attacked. Cronulla still needed that defensive work after Hynes had created the larger margin.

Our judgement for week two is therefore conditional. The Sharks have a useful combination when their kick, chase and running option make the defence cover different threats. The countercase is an opponent that handles the high ball cleanly and keeps an inside defender available. Cronulla will then need to build another chance without treating every final tackle as an invitation to repeat Hynes’s try. Saturday showed a well-timed choice; the next test is recognising when that choice is available again.

Questions from the stands

How did Hynes’s try help the Sharks beat the Cowboys 26–16?

ABC’s 66th-minute account records Hynes shaping to kick towards the corner before stepping past Taumalolo, with Drinkwater already moving towards the expected kick. His converted try made it 26–12. Our analysis is that keeping a running option made the credible kick threat more difficult to defend.

Who do the Sharks play after eliminating the Cowboys?

Cronulla will face the loser of the Panthers–Roosters qualifying final in week two. That qualifying final is on Sunday 13 September; its result is not assumed here.

What should Cronulla carry into week two?

Our preference is to retain the combination of accurate kicking, an organised chase and a running option when defenders commit elsewhere. An opponent that catches cleanly and protects the middle would require a different attacking response.

Sources & further reading

Reporting supports the facts; the interpretation is our editorial view. Published 12 Sep 2026. Updated 12 Sep 2026, 16:17 CAT.

The discussion room

Comments · 0

Open discussion · comments publish immediately

Add your view

What did you see in the game?

Bring an observation, a number or a respectful disagreement. You can contribute as a guest or a signed-in member.

✓ Guest names are optional

✓ Email addresses are never public

✓ Member history stays in your profile

Return to this discussion to read replies.

Guest comments are public immediately. Names are optional; email addresses are never shown.

Be the first to add useful context.

Keep reading

More rugby insight